THE CASE AGAINST THE ACCUSED

Court Diary
Press release: The Belgian law of Universal Jurisdiction gets a second wind, 19 July 2002.

Brussels, 18 July 2002--Amnesty International, Avocats Sans Frontières, la Fédération Internationale des Ligues des Droits de l'Homme (FIDH), Human Rights Watch, la Ligue Belge des Droits de lHomme [The Belgian League of Human Rights] and the Liga voor Mensenrechten today expressed satisfaction with a political agreement reached on 17 July 2002 between the parties of the political majority concerning Belgium's universal jurisdiction law of 16 June 1993, revised in 1999.

This week's agreement will be followed by a proposal for an interpretative law of the 1993 law enabling the pursuit of pending cases and investigations. It will also express Belgian legislators' support for the efforts made over several years by the magistrates and investigators responsible for these cases. The proposed interpretive law will additionally express support for the numerous victims involved. The agreement will be followed by a global modification of the 1993 law in order to frame the exercise of universal jurisdiction in the future.

The NGOs noted above are pleased with the efforts of the government and the political parties and the parliamentarians who have concluded this important agreement to safeguard the essence and guiding principles of Belgium's universal jurisdiction law.

The following are the key features of the 17 July 2002 Agreement:


The accused's presence on Belgian territory is no longer a required condition

The agreement confirms the will, already expressed by the legislature in 1993, that complaints against presumed perpetrators of crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide are admissible, even if the accused parties are not on Belgian territory.


A pure‚ universal jurisdiction of Belgian courts in accordance with the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court

The agreement confirms the principle of universal jurisdiction and therefore of the jurisdiction of the Belgian courts without nexus requirements.

The agreement, however, limits victims' invocation of universal jurisdiction to particular cases. In cases in which the alleged crimes have not been committed on Belgian territory and the plaintiffs are neither Belgian nor resident on Belgian territory for one year or more and the accused is not on Belgian territory, only then will the Federal Prosecutor will be competent to initiate proceedings.

These conditions are not applicable to crimes committed before the entry into force of the Statute of the new International Criminal Court (ICC), that is to say before 1 July 2002. They also do not apply to crimes committed after 1 July 2002 on the territory of a state not party to the statute of the ICC or by the national of a non-party state, or if the Security Council has referred the crimes to the ICC.



Flexibility and the possibility of evolution in the interpretation of international criminal immunity

The proposed law provides for the immunity of state officials from application of the 1993 universal jurisdiction law within the limits established by international law. Thus, the legislature has decided to grant Belgian courts the power to interpret any questions linked to immunities. This evolution, for the signatory NGOs, must be read in the light of Article 27 of the Statute of the ICC which refers to the non-opposability of criminal immunity for the most serious crimes, i.e., genocide.


By adopting the interpretative law and the modification law at the new parliamentary session in October, the Belgian Parliament will confirm its choice of the universal jurisdiction law of 1993 in a coherent and consistent manner. Belgium will thus remain at the forefront of the defense of human rights and international justice in the world by guaranteeing victims of the most serious crimes access to justice, be it national or international.

Amnesty International, Stef Vandeginste, Denis Grégoire
Avocats Sans Frontières, Caroline Stanier
FIDH, Martien Schotsmans
HRW, Olivier Bercault
Ligue des droits de l‚Homme, Maité Derue
Liga voor Mensenrechten, Paul Pataer


[The Case Against The Accused]


Search this site:

Dr. Laurie King-Irani is North American Coordinator of International Campaign for Justice for the Victims of Sabra & Shatila. For media queries, write to coordinator@indictsharon.net. For website queries, write to webmaster@indictsharon.net.

Surfed directly to this page? Add navigation frames here.

This page is part of indictsharon.net, the website of the International Campaign for Justice for the Victims of Sabra & Shatila, offering news on the case lodged in Belgium against Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and other Israelis and Lebanese responsible for the massacre, killing, rape and disappearance of civilians that took place in Beirut between 16 and 18 September 1982 in the camps of Sabra and Shatila and the surrounding area.

Copyright notice: All content copyright ©2002 indictsharon.net unless otherwise noted. No unauthorised mirroring of any part or all of this site is permitted. Links to this site or to parts of it are welcomed. Materials may be printed from this site and photocopied for activist or classroom use. Information about photographs used on this website.


website by nigelparry.net